Meshchersky biography briefly

Meshchersky Vladimir Petrovich, prince, chamberlain, journalist, publicist, prose writer. He enjoyed the great respect of the king. In the x From G. founded the newspaper Friendly Speech. He sharply criticized the reformation course P. was the opponent of Russia's participation in a large European war. The materials of the book were used: Rasputin's diary. This text belongs to the compilers of the book - Cand.

Kotsyubinsky and cand. Meshchersky, Vladimir Petrovich [11 began to be published since the year in the Northern Bee, Moscow Vedomosti, Russian Bulletin. The first books: the poem “Taurida”, “Essays on the current public life in Russia” being close to the court and government circles that subsidized his publications - “citizen”, “good”, “friendly speeches”, M. Along with journalism, the collections of “Speech of the Conservative”, “into the evidence of the times”, M.

in novels, novels and comedies, which were primitively edible, in nature. distinguished by the schematics of the characters, illustrativeness, M. Tyutchev, L. Tolstoy, A. Tolstoy, F. Dostoevsky, memoirs “My memories” are a brief literary encyclopedia in 9 volumes. State Scientific Publishing House "Soviet Encyclopedia", vol. Meshchersky, book. Vladimir Petrovich was born in S. Karamzina-he was the grandson of the great Russian historian and writer N.

along the line of his father-lieutenant colonel of the guard P. Meshchersky, the grandson of the famous translator and author of religious and moral books for the people of Princess S., an indispensable cult of the historian Karamzin reigned, which, apparently, predetermined the desire of the young prince for writing. Having received an excellent home education, he graduated from the school of law in - served ml.

In the summer, he accompanied the royal family during a trip to the Crimea. With the Meshchersky chamber-junker, s-chamberlain of the highest yard. In the affairs of the Meshchersky service, many and often had to drive through the provinces of Russia. He recognized the country not from the high offices of the authorities and firsthand. Much of what he saw and heard on trips even then plunged the young official into rather sad thoughts regarding the correctness of the selected methods of the reorganization of Russia.

Russia took life from different liberal newspapers and magazines. It was the liberal and false -liner seal that took possession of society as well as the tavern captured the people, ”he wrote in his“ Conservative speeches ”. And committed in the same years, on behalf of the heir to the throne and the Minister of Internal Affairs of a trip to the UK, France, Holland, Switzerland, Germany allowed him to understand quite well in the features of Western political systems.

In unexpectedly for friends and relatives, Meshchersky announces his decision to leave the service and engage in professional journalism. The decision, by the standards of the people of his circle, is very strange. Already in X and N. A series of pampflets and novels of Meshchersky brought the author a great and well-deserved success. This is: the story “10 years old from the life of the magazine editor”, “Notes of the shooting gymnasiumist”, “A terrible night”, “Prince Noni”; novels: “One of our Bismarks” -, “The Secrets of Modern St.

Petersburg” -, “Women from the St. Petersburg Greater Light” -, “Monkey Count in a new place” and other Prire of Prince. Meshchersky belongs to several plays, of which the comedy “Heart Diseases” and “Million” were set up in the Alexandrian theater. His poetic collections were also published. The main problems raised by Meshchersky in these works are the cosmopolitanism of the highest bureaucracy, the moral degradation of the high -society society, the corruption of youth, careerism and an unbridled thirst for money.

Against the backdrop of the weakening of religiosity and the dominance of liberal-bourgeois views, these social vices led, according to the author, post-reforming Russia to severe social shocks. But with literary success, the number of influential ill -wishers of the prince grew rapidly. A special “photographic” method of writing contributed to the fact that people accurately guessed themselves in satirical characters: Minister P.

Valuev, editor of “Contemporary” by the poet N. Nekrasov, historian N. N. Meshchersky’s response were endless insults in the press, the spread of the vile gossip, anonymous epigrams walking in their hands. The name of the prince was inextricably linked in the public consciousness primarily with the existence of the Gazeta magazine “Citizen”, based on Meshchersky in private donations.

In the first issue of the new publication in the “Announcement of Readers”, it was proclaimed: “We are not attributed to any workshop. We become directly and firmly in the midst of the life of the Russian state and draw from it those principles that should be formed by our magazine. Our inner life, in all its layers, will be the main subject of our attention. In ourselves, in the bud of our spiritual life, there is the power, on the development of which all our future depends.

" In his publication, Meshchersky tried to implement his favorite slogan - “study Russia”.On the pages of the “citizen”, all the topical issues of the then life of Russia were widely discussed: problems of foreign policy, the church issue, the problems of education, the working and peasant issues, the fight against drunkenness, the molestation of morals, etc. The main place was occupied by journalism, but the heads of novels, novels, and verses were published.

There was a very good bibliographic department. F. Tyutchev, A. Tolstoy, M. Pogodin, I. Aksakov, F. Dostoevsky B-one of the editors, Y. Polonsky, A. Maikov, V. Nemirovich-Danchenko, N. Strakhov, V. Rozanov and others were printed in the “citizen”. Here, one after another, his journalistic works are published against the methods by which transformations were carried out in Russia.

A great trouble for the whole of Russia, according to Meshchersky, is the one that the most important transformations are advanced by the cosmopolitan bureaucracy, a Chinese wall of fenced off from the Russian people. With the abolition of serfdom, the Russian nobility was also pushed away from the people. They assured everyone and everyone, even assured the nobility itself that serfdom and nobility are the same thing, ”Meshchersky wrote bitterly.

He saw the preservation of Russia as a huge power in the strengthening of those spiritual-moral and state-folk ideals that the country lived, starting from Vladimir Saint. Otherwise, Russia is waiting for the fate of the colony of non -Russian Europe. The political ideal of Meshchersky was the time of the reign of Nicholas I - the period of strong from the autocratic power, based on the nobility and the multimillion people with its faith in God and the king.

The greatest influence of the prince’s newspaper magazine enjoyed during the reign of Alexander III, when articles published here with the ideological substantiation of counter-reforms were perceived by court circles as a reflection of the views of the king himself. Then the influence of this publication fell noticeably. The attitude towards the prince, even in conservative circles, has always been ambiguous.

Personal attacks, knitting and causticity admitted to him in his articles, some negative features of his character made Meshchersky many influential enemies. The articles of the prince have repeatedly been criticized by representatives of the conservative press. Meshchersky also published the magazines “Good”, “Dobryak”, “Friendly Speech”, the newspaper “Rus” is not in the public service, Prince.

Meshchersky as a representative of a noble family, whose members were always entered into the highest spheres, considered himself entitled to intervene in the affairs of state life and sometimes sought precisely those decisions that matured in the silence of his office. It happened, for example. Pleve is a supporter of the coolest repressive measures against the revolutionary and liberal movement.

Every day, the prince tried to influence the resolution of foreign policy issues in Grodno Lane in S.. In particular, he persistently warned Emperor Nicholas II against entering the war with Japan, and then with Germany. Being a convinced supporter of autocratic power, Meshchersky showed hesitation only once - in the fall, when he advocated the introduction of the constitution for the sake of saving the monarchy.

Meshchersky was one of the inspirers of the law-monarchical movement, and supported the Union of the Russian People and the Union of landowners. There are many facts of Meshchersky’s personal disinterestedness: the organization of assistance during hunger in the Samara Territory, constant assistance to the care of patients and poor children, content, and at their own expense of medical workers for chronically sick children, etc.

Klimakov used the materials of the KN.